No I believe CW/CCW is separate pulses for each direction, where quadrature is two signals 90 degrees out of phase.
Step/Dir can be converted to CW/CCW steps with 2 "and" gates and an inverter.
Regards
TK
Group: DynoMotion
Message: 11052
From: Tom Kerekes
Date: 2/9/2015
Subject: Re: CW/CCW vs quadrature
Hi Colin,
I can't see how that could be correct or would work. From the description from Leadshine below it seems clear they are expecting CW pulses and CCW pulses not Quadrature.
I supposed I would tie A0 to direction, and A1 to step. Then connect O2 and O3 to CW/CCW by connecting them to the opto isolator cathodes with the anode tied to ground. I would take these from JP4 and JP6 as LVTTL.
No I believe CW/CCW is separate pulses for each direction, where quadrature is two signals 90 degrees out of phase.
Step/Dir can be converted to CW/CCW steps with 2 "and" gates and an inverter.
Regards
TK
Group: DynoMotion
Message: 11146
From: Tom Kerekes
Date: 3/2/2015
Subject: Re: CW/CCW vs quadrature
Hi Colin,
I think that logic is correct but not the voltage levels. The VHC series logic requires 0.7xVcc = 0.7x5V = 3.5V for a guaranteed high input. KFLOP's 3.3V LVTTL outputs only guarantee 2.8V. I believe the 74S139 would work. They are standard 5V TTL that requires a 2V High input level and will drive up to 20ma (I think the Leadshine inputs require about 13ma based on the 270 ohm series resistance they show). See: